The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a forfeiture complaint against two Mission Crew Trainers (MCTs) that were intercepted while being transported from the Test Flying Academy of South Africa to the People’s Republic of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA).
MCTs are advanced, mobile simulation classrooms used to prepare aircrews for mission readiness.
According to the DOJ, the equipment was unlawfully exported and destined for use by China’s military.
Allegations of Enabling Chinese Military Capabilities
In a statement, the US Justice Department alleged that the South Africa-based flying academy acted as an enabler of China’s air and naval forces, describing it as a conduit for transferring NATO aviation expertise, operational knowledge and restricted technology to the PLA.
The department said the academy was established in 2003, with the support of the South African government, to facilitate cooperation with China.
The DOJ stated that the seizure highlights what it described as the ongoing threat posed by China and its enablers to US national security through the unlawful procurement of American military technology.
Accusations Against the Academy
The Oudtshoorn-based Test Flying Academy of South Africa is accused of illegally exporting US military flight simulator technology and recruiting former NATO pilots to train members of China’s military.
US authorities further alleged that the academy has continued to leverage US military expertise against US interests, despite sanctions imposed on the organisation in 2023.
Academy Rejects Claims
The academy has previously expressed disappointment over the US sanctions, maintaining that it operates under strict protocols and a formal code of conduct designed to prevent the sharing of classified or operationally sensitive information.
It has denied any wrongdoing, insisting that its activities comply with applicable laws and international standards.
Broader Implications
The forfeiture action forms part of broader US efforts to curb the unauthorised transfer of military technology and expertise, particularly where such transfers may enhance the capabilities of foreign armed forces considered strategic competitors.
The matter remains before the courts, with further legal proceedings expected as the forfeiture process continues.
