Travellers from South Africa using the Beitbridge–Bulawayo route claim that an inland checkpoint in Gwanda has turned into a nightmare stop, with police and tax officials accused of running what locals describe as an ‘illegal border post’.
The passengers say officials are confiscating their groceries despite the travellers already clearing customs at the official border.
Travellers complain about repeated searches
Authorities reportedly stop buses and taxis coming from South Africa soon after entering Gwanda in Matabeleland South.
Travellers allege that Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) officers and Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) officials conduct fresh inspections. This happens even though passengers have already cleared immigration and customs at Beitbridge.
According to the travellers, officials go through their groceries, check passports and spend long periods questioning passengers, causing delays that stretch for hours.
Travellers face the same issues beyond Matabeleland
Some Zimbabweans argue that this does not only happen in Matabeleland only, but also happens in other parts of the country.
“It happens just after Mukuvisi river after the tollgate into Harare,” said Dumi Ngwala responding to claims that this operation merely targets Matabeleland region. “It happens in Zimunya before entering Mutare, it happens before you reach Gweru…nothing is unique for Matabeleland as the narrative and motive seems to want to reflect.”
ZIMRA responds to the allegations
Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) has denied allegations that it has set up an “illegal border” in Gwanda.
ZIMRA insists that all inland operations are legal, intelligence-driven, and nationwide.
The authority said officials request passports as part of routine verification to confirm travellers’ import status. ZIMRA says it cannot recharge duties already paid at Beitbridge unless legal criteria are met.
A ZIMRA statement emphasised:
“ZIMRA does not set up internal border posts, and any officer found conducting illegal or unauthorised activities will face disciplinary action and prosecution.”
